|
Vol 20 -
September
2008
Who is the regulator of medicines and
who is not?
With
the ongoing Herceptin debate many New Zealanders must be pondering
this same question, Ken Shirley, RMI, chief executive officer,
observed.
Medsafe, a business unit of the Ministry of
Health is charged with the important task of evaluating the safety,
efficacy and quality of medicines that it recommends for ministerial
consent to distribute in New Zealand.
On
the other hand PHARMAC is a stand alone Crown agency given the task
of procuring the medicines for people in need within New Zealand
from within the funding provided. Both roles are important but
quite different.
It
seems that all too often PHARMAC’s innate zeal for cost containment
entices them to pronounce on safety and efficacy matters, sometimes
in a manner that puts them at odds with Medsafe, the
regulator.
Medsafe recommended the 12 month course of Herceptin treatment for
women with HER-2 positive breast cancer on the basis of available
clinical data worldwide.
The
nine week Herceptin treatment funded and vigorously promoted by
PHARMAC as an alternative treatment regime was specifically rejected
by the independent Medicines Assessment Advisory Committee on the
basis that there was insufficient data of a regulatory quality to
justify a change in the existing approved indication of 12 months.
Undaunted by this clear unequivocal assessment PHARMAC continues a
media campaign with its chief executive (a micro-economist) stating
in an open letter:-
“We don’t have confidence that taking the
drug for longer (more than 9 weeks) would show better results . . .
. . . it would not be responsible to fund the longer
treatment.”
This
contrasts directly with the regulator’s position based on their
safety and efficacy evaluation. In support of their case
PHARMAC frequently refers to an article published in the
Lancet. What they don’t say is that this article was written
and submitted for publication by PHARMAC staff.
The
chief executive of PHARMAC has also stated:
“Most countries only fund 12 months therapy
because that is what Roche has applied for. . . . . . . . Most
countries can only consider funding the treatment regime applied for
by the company. In New Zealand we don’t have that
constraint.”
It
was PHARMAC that applied for the registration of the alternative
nine week Herceptin course and it was the regulator who said “no” on
the basis of the independent efficacy and safety evaluation by
recognised medical experts.
As
taxpayers we all benefit from the cost savings that PHARMAC can
secure as a single purchaser although we should all be very wary
when a commercially active agency like PHARMAC starts usurping the
regulator whose focus is safety, efficacy and
quality.
R&D spend
increases
America’s pharmaceutical
and biotechnology research companies
invested a record $58.8 billion
last year in the research and
development of new life-changing
medicines and vaccines – an increase of nearly $3 billion from 2006,
according to analyses by the Pharmaceutical Research and
Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) and Burrill & Company.
Over the past seven
years, America’s pharmaceutical research companies have consistently
invested around 18 percent of sales on R&D
activities.
As in past years, there
are an increasing number of potential new drugs entering clinical
testing. Today, there are more than 2,700 medicines in development
in the U.S. for nearly 4,600 different indications. Five years ago,
there were about 2,000 medicines in
development.
 |
This
newsletter is published on behalf of the Researched
Medicines Industry Association of New Zealand. The views and
opinions expressed in this publication are not necessarily
those of the RMI.
For further
information: Researched
Medicines Industry Association PO Box 10447
Wellington Phone 04 499 4277 http://www.rmianz.co.nz
| |